The role of the media in our democracy

tasnim455

Once representation is recognized in our democratic political system, the reality that the right to participation corresponds to citizens, and not to parties (STS of February , ) invites us to analyze the existence of defects in this system due to the abuse of the media in Politics, creating a Democracy of audience. From the constitutional provision, our Constitutional Court soon emphasized the importance of the indicated principles of direct or indirect participation and representation of article CE, as the way to exercise the sovereignty that the same precept establishes that resides in the Spanish people (SSTC / and /) although “only those whose appointment results directly from the popular election are called representatives” (STC /). In relation to the principle of representation, we start from the fact that: "the electoral process as a whole is not only a channel to exercise individual rights, but it is also a means to provide the institutions of the democratic State with the capacity of expression and provide centers of political decisions that are effective and capable of providing a general orientation to the latter's action” (STC /). Knowing that the right of participation is a fundamental right that admits the call to intervene directly in political decision-making (STC /).

The authentic representative relationship has today been limited to the party-elector relationship. That is why we find ourselves facing a scandalous contrast between political reality and legal reality. Affirmation that finds support in the jurisprudential distinction that confirms this distinction, in the right to access Canada Mobile Number List public positions and functions under conditions of equality (art. CE) and in the right of citizens to participate in public affairs (art. CE) (SSTS /, of March or / of September ). We must not forget that parliamentarians, being legitimized by the election, represent citizens in the State and their legal position, after obtaining citizen trust, turns them into a mechanism and instrument at the service of their purposes. Notwithstanding what has been said, limitations to the idea of ​​representation must be recognized, from the moment in which the decisions of the representative materialize in decisions taken and analyzed according to the criteria of the chosen one, which is why Professor Hanna Pitkin analyzed political representation as a multidimensional concept authorization, symbolic, authority. Likewise, Professor Manin presented the existence of three types of representation in a political dimension; audience democracy, parliamentarism and party democracy.



Each of them makes us reflect on the role and significance of the role of the media in the transformation process that is generated to move from a representative government to an audience democracy. This role of the media makes the search for power the objective of its deployment and analysis, making the candidate an object of the media program. This phenomenon of the media, together with the public space it encompasses, makes us criticize the current representative-represented relationship and ignore the control of the Rule of Law to said media. Regarding this “Media Democracy”, the media adopt a basic role in the political process, because as Professor Giovanni Sartori will point out, television has changed political relations, by verifying that public opinion is mediated by the media. media, forging their opinions according to the television message. We will thus be able to differentiate between “homo sapiens” and “homo videns”, the man of the image, the objective of the remote-controlled society, in which everything ends up being visualized.