|
|
Showed that, betweenof processes requesting the removal of content were denied. In his view, there is a lack of robust parameters in the public debate on the subject. Lincoln Macário, from the Brazilian Association of Public Communication (ABCPública), defended measures of transparency and accessibility to terms of use. According to him, notifications about illegal content are often ignored and controversial content is not removed because it causes engagement. On the side of consumer protection associations, Walter de Moura, from the Brazilian Institute of Consumer Protection (Idec), supported the constitutionality of article 19 and the need to maintain the objective and joint responsibility of providers in consumer relations. Guilherme Martins and João Victor Longh, from the Brazilian Institute of Consumer Policy and Law (Brasilcon), defended extrajudicial notification as the most reasonable solution to preserve the rights of victims of hate speech, discrimination and digital violence.
For them, the lack of regulation on the topic and the lack of accountability on platforms pose a risk to freedom of expression. With information from the STF press office .It is not possible to stop a criminal action if there was no illegality in the prosecution and if the complaint presented meets all formal requirements, with just cause recognized based on elements gathered in the investigation. Rovena Rosa/Agência Bra Special Phone Number Data sil Rovena Rosa/Agência Brasil Man was reported for non-compliance with health measures after breaking into a hospital ward With this understanding, the 12th Criminal Law Chamber of the São Paulo Court of Justice unanimously denied a request to suspend criminal proceedings against a man accused of qualified damage and non-compliance with health measures. The man was reported for having invaded, in April 2021, the ward intended for patients with Covid-19 of a hospital in the municipality of Castilho, disrespecting health standards to combat the disease. He also allegedly broke a hospital door and argued with and attacked an employee.
According to the rapporteur, judge Sérgio Mazina Martins, at least in the formal aspect, the complaint is "perfectly capable" of giving rise to the continuation of the action, since it contains all the elements established in article 41 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. "The complaint certainly brings the imputation of facts that, in theory, can characterize crimes within the scope of criminal law. The description of punishable conduct is supported, at least at the threshold of criminal action, on reports and data indicative of the occurrence of a consistent criminal offense in violation of preventive health measures, qualified damage and the misdemeanor of acts of fact", he stated. In this context, the rapporteur said that the continuation of the action cannot be impeded, nor can the public justice system be restricted from accessing judicial services on behalf of society, preventing it from deducing the accusation and producing evidence at the opportune procedural moment: "The public interest and the need to investigate the real truth about the occurrence of possible criminal offenses."he Full Court of the Superior Labor Court will decide whether paragraph 1 of article 223-G of the CLT, included by the labor reform , which provides for the pricing of compensation for moral damages based on the employee's contractual salary, is constitutional.
|
|
发表于 2024-2-19 13:28:32